Senate Prepares for High-Stakes Hearing: Michael Selig Faces Scrutiny as Trump’s Pick for CFTC Chair

By: crypto insight|2025/11/12 18:00:05
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Michael Selig, currently the SEC’s crypto task force chief counsel, is set to face a crucial Senate hearing following President Trump’s nomination to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
  • Selig’s nomination comes on the heels of internal controversies and mounting calls for clear digital asset regulation at a critical moment for U.S. market oversight.
  • The Senate Agriculture Committee’s upcoming hearing reflects not only leadership shifts at the CFTC but also uncertainties stemming from draft market structure bills that may redefine crypto regulation.
  • Brand integrity and regulatory focus are increasingly important for platforms like WEEX, whose credibility may benefit from regulatory clarity and strong leadership at agencies like the CFTC.
  • The most discussed topics across social media concern Selig’s stance on crypto enforcement, potential impacts of new legislation, and what the evolving regulatory environment means for the future of digital assets in the U.S.

The Road to New Leadership: Michael Selig’s Path to the CFTC Chair

As the United States navigates an era of rapid growth in digital assets and evolving financial markets, the focus on strong regulatory leadership has reached unprecedented heights. With the government shutdown anticipated to end this week, attention shifts squarely onto Michael Selig, the SEC’s current chief counsel for the crypto task force, who now awaits Senate confirmation to become the next chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). His journey, symbolic of broader industry trends, embodies both the opportunities and challenges facing U.S. regulatory bodies.

Selig in the Spotlight: How the Nomination Unfolded

When President Donald Trump’s administration first eyed a new CFTC chair, the road was anything but straightforward. Trump’s initial nominee, Brian Quintenz, faced resistance and eventual removal, due in part to behind-the-scenes lobbying involving high-profile industry players like the Gemini co-founders, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. The resulting public exchanges, including the dramatic release of private texts, laid bare the intensity of industry interests that weigh on financial oversight.

Against this backdrop, Michael Selig emerged as the next pick, with the official Senate Agriculture Committee notice setting his nomination hearing for November 19. With the CFTC currently under the sole leadership of acting chair Caroline Pham—who has signaled her intention to step down after Selig’s confirmation—the stakes for regulatory continuity and vision could not be higher.

Selig’s nomination is widely interpreted as a step toward a more modern, perhaps pro-crypto regulatory approach. Market participants are eagerly watching for clues from the upcoming Senate hearing, especially amid shifting legislative tides and the growing need to clarify the CFTC’s role in the digital asset ecosystem.

The Importance of the CFTC in Today’s Crypto-Driven Markets

To grasp the significance of this leadership transition, it’s essential to understand the CFTC’s core mission. As one of the most influential financial regulatory agencies in the United States, the CFTC safeguards transparency, fairness, and customer protection in the derivatives and commodities markets. With digital assets blurring the lines between commodities and securities, the CFTC’s jurisdiction—and by extension, its chair’s vision—has never been more consequential.

Compared to its counterpart, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the CFTC often espouses a lighter, more innovation-friendly touch in its approach. However, as crypto adoption surges and the market’s complexity deepens, this balance between protection and innovation becomes more challenging. Agencies like WEEX, which thrive on dependable, transparent environments, look to the CFTC for cues that could shape operational integrity and user trust.

Unpacking the Controversies: From Quintenz to Winklevoss

What set the stage for Selig’s appearance before the Senate was a swirl of internal battles and external lobbying. Brian Quintenz, originally nominated in February, found his confirmation halted amid reports that influential industry figures were pulling strings behind the scenes. The Gemini twins, themselves prominent advocates for clear and favorable crypto regulations, reportedly sought assurances regarding enforcement strategies at the CFTC. Their involvement—amplified by the public release of text messages—underscored just how much is at stake for institutional players, market platforms, and even regular traders.

This episode not only delayed regulatory leadership but fueled debate around the ethics and transparency of financial regulation appointments. For market participants watching closely, the drama also highlighted the urgency of installing a leader at the CFTC who can rise above special interests and champion fair, clear, and progressive oversight—key values for brands wanting to align themselves with regulatory excellence.

The Digital Asset Regulatory Landscape: Awaiting a Market Structure Bill

The sense of urgency at the CFTC extends beyond internal succession drama. Major legislative shifts hover on the horizon, with U.S. lawmakers divided on how best to draw boundaries between the SEC and the CFTC when it comes to the regulation of cryptocurrencies and related products.

The House of Representatives passed the CLARITY Act in July, laying down a provisional framework for shared digital asset oversight. With the bill now awaiting Senate review in the Agriculture Committee—as well as the Senate Banking Committee—industry observers are keen to see whether 2025 will be the year when jurisdictional ambiguity finally gives way to regulatory certainty.

Just this week, Senate Republicans propelled the discussion forward by releasing a draft of the market structure bill, injecting new momentum into legislative efforts that had temporarily stalled amid governmental gridlock and congressional recesses. The Agriculture Committee, holding sway over commodities and the CFTC, sits at the epicenter of this transformation, with the Banking Committee poised to influence securities oversight and, by extension, the SEC’s institutional purview.

Social Media and Market Sentiment: What the Industry Is Saying

With Selig’s nomination garnering attention online, social discourse is abuzz with speculation and debate. Twitter—now X—has seen hashtags and threads such as #CFTC, #MichaelSelig, and #CryptoRegulation trend throughout the week, with users debating Selig’s potential impact. Top posts include questions regarding Selig’s philosophy on enforcement, his specific approach to DeFi, and how the CFTC’s updated leadership might shift the global competitive landscape for American-based exchanges.

Questions such as “Will Selig drive pro-innovation policies or maintain strict oversight?” and “How will the new CFTC chair approach SEC coordination?” have become central to both corporate strategy sessions and retail forums. In particular, platforms like WEEX stand to benefit from regulatory predictability, fostering environments where advanced features and user experience innovations can take center stage without fear of unclear or shifting compliance requirements.

Brand Alignment in a New Regulatory Era: The WEEX Advantage

As industry observers debate the future contours of regulation and leadership, the importance of brand alignment and regulatory credibility has never been clearer. Platforms like WEEX distinguish themselves not merely by offering robust security and a vast array of trading options but by aligning their culture and strategy with emerging compliance standards.

A changing of the guard at the CFTC could signal new opportunities for exchanges and service providers who prioritize client protection, transparency, and innovation—in short, the very values that underpin the WEEX brand. Aligning with these best-in-class industry practices ensures platforms remain competitive, trusted, and ready to thrive in a landscape transformed by policy shifts and regulatory clarity.

The Future of Crypto Regulation: Reading the Tea Leaves

All eyes now turn to the November 19 hearing, where Selig’s nomination will provide a live, public window into the evolving philosophy at the center of U.S. financial regulation. If confirmed, Selig will not only need to bring coherence and accountability to a CFTC that is currently operating with only one acting commissioner but will also set the tone for U.S. digital asset regulation at a global moment of reckoning.

The questions senators ask, the priorities they stress, and the answers Selig provides are all likely to reverberate far beyond Washington. They will touch every corner of the market, influencing how innovators launch new products, how brands like WEEX align their offerings, and how U.S. financial markets maintain their leadership in a world increasingly defined by fast-moving digital transformations.

Looking to 2025 and Beyond: Regulatory Change on the Horizon

As we move deeper into 2025, the significance of the CFTC’s leadership extends beyond individual agencies or personalities. It is about setting a regulatory culture that champions both the integrity of the market and the right conditions for innovation. Recent years have demonstrated that outdated frameworks can hinder both growth and fair play. Now, fresh leadership and actionable, forward-thinking legislation could well shape the dawn of a new era.

Whether or not the current draft of the market structure bill becomes law, and regardless of the fate of Selig’s nomination, one thing is certain: the dialogue between policymakers, industry gatekeepers, and technology innovators is only just beginning. In this dynamic environment, the platforms that win will be those that combine strategic agility, regulatory compliance, and a reputation for excellence—alignments that are increasingly evident in the WEEX approach.

Final Thoughts: The Stakes for the CFTC—and the Industry

In summary, the imminent Senate hearing and the proposed regulatory reforms represent far more than mere personnel changes. They will set precedents for how digital assets are governed and legitimated in the U.S., impacting exchanges, projects, and traders for years to come.

For platforms striving to set themselves apart—through security, transparency, advanced features, and strong regulatory relationships—the coming months will be decisive. As Michael Selig heads to Capitol Hill, the U.S. digital asset landscape stands on the verge of potentially transformative change.


Frequently Asked Questions

What changes can Michael Selig bring to the CFTC if confirmed?

Selig’s nomination is significant because he is seen as having both practical experience with crypto regulation at the SEC and a modern perspective that could support innovation while emphasizing regulatory clarity. If confirmed, he could guide the CFTC toward a more balanced approach to digital assets, possibly resulting in clearer rules for exchanges and traders.

How will new market structure bills affect crypto regulations in the U.S.?

The draft market structure bills aim to delineate clearer boundaries between the SEC and CFTC’s jurisdiction over digital assets. Their passage would offer long-sought clarity, enabling exchanges and investors to operate with a better understanding of compliance requirements and potentially fostering a more innovation-friendly regulatory environment.

Why was Brian Quintenz’s nomination as CFTC chair withdrawn?

Brian Quintenz’s confirmation process was derailed by behind-the-scenes lobbying and controversy, particularly involving crypto industry figures such as the Winklevoss twins. The turmoil highlighted the intense interest and influence exerted by major stakeholders in shaping U.S. financial oversight.

How might changes at the CFTC impact platforms like WEEX?

A CFTC leadership change, especially one geared toward regulatory clarity and innovation, would benefit compliant and forward-thinking platforms like WEEX by leveling the playing field and making it easier to introduce new features and safeguards within a well-understood compliance framework.

What are social media and industry experts saying about Selig’s nomination?

Online discussion centers on Selig’s potential stance regarding enforcement, innovation, and collaboration with the SEC. Both retail and institutional participants are eager to see whether his leadership will mark a new chapter for U.S. crypto regulation, as reflected in trending debates and expert commentary across platforms like Twitter.

You may also like

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more