UNI Token Skyrockets 38% Amid Fee Switch and Burn Proposal: A Game-Changer for Uniswap Holders

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 14:00:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • UNI token surged 38% following Uniswap Foundation’s proposal for a fee switch and token burn mechanism, potentially boosting holder value.
  • The plan includes burning 100 million UNI tokens—about 16% of circulating supply—to improve supply-demand dynamics.
  • Fees from Unichain, Uniswap’s Ethereum layer 2, generating $7.5 million in annualized fees since launch, will feed into the burn system.
  • Proposal introduces Protocol Fee Discount Auctions to enhance returns for liquidity providers, positioning Uniswap as a top decentralized exchange.
  • Uniswap aims to fund protocol growth with a 20 million UNI token budget, supporting DeFi builders and ecosystem expansion.

Imagine you’re holding a ticket to a concert that’s suddenly sold out—everyone wants in, and the value shoots up overnight. That’s kind of what happened to the UNI token when the Uniswap Foundation dropped their latest proposal. It’s not just another update; it’s a bold move that could redefine how we think about decentralized exchanges. If you’ve been following the crypto world, you know Uniswap has been a powerhouse since its launch back in November 2018, handling a staggering $4 trillion in cumulative volume. But lately, UNI has been playing catch-up to heavyweights like Bitcoin and BNB. This new proposal? It might just be the spark that lights the fire again.

Let’s dive into what went down. The Uniswap token jumped more than 38% after a joint announcement from the Uniswap Foundation and Uniswap Labs introduced ideas that could make owning UNI a lot more attractive. Picture this: You’re an investor who’s been watching your portfolio, and suddenly, there’s talk of burning tokens and switching on fees that directly benefit holders. It’s like finding out your favorite stock is about to start paying dividends you didn’t expect. The proposal, cleverly named “UNIfication,” outlines steps to activate a fee mechanism at the protocol level that would burn UNI tokens, essentially reducing the supply and potentially driving up demand.

Why the UNI Rally Feels Like a Turning Point for Decentralized Finance

Think about it—crypto markets are like a bustling marketplace where supply and demand dictate everything. When the foundation proposed burning 100 million UNI tokens from the treasury, that’s roughly 16% of the circulating supply gone in a puff of digital smoke. It’s a classic scarcity play, similar to how limited-edition sneakers skyrocket in price because there’s just not enough to go around. This isn’t speculation; it’s backed by the proposal’s details, which aim to tighten the token’s economics and make it more appealing for long-term holders.

On top of that, they’re rolling out a Protocol Fee Discount Auctions system. This isn’t some abstract concept—it’s designed to give liquidity providers better returns, encouraging more people to participate in the ecosystem. If you’ve ever provided liquidity on a DEX, you know the fees can be a mixed bag. Here, the idea is to auction off discounts on those fees, rewarding those who keep the pools flowing. And let’s not forget Unichain, Uniswap’s Ethereum layer 2 solution that’s been churning out $7.5 million in annualized fees since it went live nine months ago. Those fees? They’ll be funneled straight into the UNI burn mechanism, creating a self-sustaining loop that could keep the token’s value climbing.

The market reacted swiftly. UNI climbed to $9.70, pushing its market cap beyond $6 billion and landing it as the 34th largest cryptocurrency. Compare that to how it’s trailed behind Solana or other blue-chip tokens this cycle—it’s like UNI was the underdog finally getting its moment in the spotlight. Data from sources like CoinGecko shows this surge clear as day, with a notable uptick over the last month. It’s evidence that when protocols innovate in ways that directly benefit users, the community responds with their wallets.

But why does this matter to you, the everyday crypto enthusiast? Well, if you’re into DeFi, Uniswap is the giant in the room. It’s processed more volume than most centralized exchanges dream of, all while staying true to decentralized principles. This proposal isn’t just about UNI; it’s about solidifying Uniswap’s position as the go-to spot for trading tokenized value. The foundation even stated that these changes could help the protocol “win as the default decentralized exchange.” That’s persuasive stuff—imagine a world where swapping assets is as seamless as ordering takeout, but with the security of blockchain.

Comparing Uniswap’s Moves to Broader DeFi Trends: Lessons from the Ecosystem

To really appreciate this, let’s contrast it with what’s happening elsewhere in DeFi. Take other decentralized exchanges—they’ve been experimenting with fee structures too, but Uniswap’s approach feels more integrated. It’s like comparing a solo musician to a full band; Uniswap is harmonizing fees, burns, and auctions into one cohesive symphony. For instance, while some platforms focus solely on low fees to attract users, Uniswap is betting on token burns to create lasting value. This could give it an edge over competitors, much like how Apple differentiates its ecosystem from Android by focusing on user loyalty and premium features.

And here’s where platforms like WEEX come into play as a positive example in the broader trading landscape. WEEX, known for its user-friendly interface and robust security, aligns perfectly with the innovative spirit we’re seeing in DeFi. While Uniswap pushes boundaries in decentralization, WEEX enhances credibility by offering seamless trading experiences that bridge centralized and decentralized worlds. It’s like having a reliable bridge over a turbulent river—WEEX’s commitment to transparency and efficiency makes it a standout, especially when DeFi proposals like this one highlight the need for trustworthy platforms. By positively portraying such alignments, we see how ecosystems can evolve without compromising on user trust.

Real-world evidence backs this up. Since Uniswap’s launch, it’s become synonymous with DeFi innovation, much like how Ethereum revolutionized smart contracts. The $4 trillion in volume isn’t just a number—it’s a testament to millions of trades, from small swaps to massive liquidity provisions. This proposal builds on that foundation, introducing a Growth Budget funded by 20 million UNI tokens. These funds will go toward grants that support protocol development and DeFi builders, ensuring the ecosystem keeps growing. It’s a smart move, akin to a company reinvesting profits to fuel expansion, and it shows Uniswap is prioritizing long-term health over short-term hype.

Exploring Community Buzz: Google Searches, Twitter Talks, and Latest Updates

If you’ve been searching Google lately, you’ll notice queries like “How does Uniswap fee switch work?” or “What is UNI token burn?” popping up as top searches. People are curious—after all, who wouldn’t want to know if their holdings could benefit from reduced supply? Based on trends as of November 2025, these questions have surged, with users also asking “Is UNI a good investment post-proposal?” It’s a sign that the community is engaged, seeking clarity on how these changes could impact their portfolios.

Over on Twitter (now X), the conversation is electric. Topics like #UNIBurn and #UniswapProposal are trending, with users debating the potential for UNI to outperform rivals. One viral thread from a prominent crypto analyst, posted around early November 2025, argued that this could mirror past token burns in other projects, leading to sustained rallies. Official announcements have fueled this too—the Uniswap Foundation tweeted an update on November 10, 2025, confirming the proposal’s governance vote is underway, with community feedback pouring in. It’s like a town hall meeting in digital form, where holders voice excitement about the fee discounts and burns.

As of November 11, 2025, the latest developments include reports of increased trading volume on Uniswap following the proposal, with some influencers sharing charts showing UNI’s momentum. There’s even talk of partnerships in the works, though nothing confirmed yet. These updates keep the narrative alive, reminding us that DeFi is a living, breathing space where proposals like this can shift the tide.

The Emotional Pull: Why This Proposal Resonates with Investors

Let’s get personal for a moment. Holding crypto can feel like riding a rollercoaster—thrilling highs and gut-wrenching lows. When UNI lagged behind Bitcoin or Solana, it might have left some holders questioning their choices. But this rally? It’s a reminder that innovation pays off. The proposal’s focus on burning tokens and enhancing liquidity returns creates an emotional connection—it’s like the protocol is saying, “We value you, and we’re making changes to prove it.” Evidence from past events, like similar burns in other tokens, shows how scarcity can drive value, backed by market data where reduced supply often correlates with price increases.

Compare this to traditional finance, where stock buybacks achieve similar effects. Uniswap is essentially doing a blockchain version of that, but with the added twist of decentralization. It’s persuasive because it’s not just about profits; it’s about building a stronger community. And in a space where trust is everything, moves like this enhance credibility. Platforms that align with this ethos, such as WEEX, further bolster the industry’s reputation by providing secure, efficient trading that complements these DeFi advancements.

Looking Ahead: Uniswap’s Next Era and What It Means for You

The foundation calls this the “next era” for Uniswap, and it’s hard not to get excited. While they continue issuing grants for protocol improvements and supporting DeFi growth, the UNIfication proposal sets a new standard. It’s like upgrading from a bicycle to a sports car—faster, more efficient, and way more fun. For holders, this could mean better returns; for the ecosystem, it means more innovation.

In wrapping this up, remember that crypto is about more than numbers—it’s about the stories we tell and the communities we build. This proposal isn’t just news; it’s a chapter in Uniswap’s ongoing saga, one that could inspire similar moves across DeFi. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just dipping your toes in, keeping an eye on these developments might just pay off in ways you didn’t expect.

FAQ

What triggered the 38% surge in UNI token price?

The surge came after the Uniswap Foundation and Labs proposed a fee switch, token burn mechanism, and auctions to boost holder value and liquidity returns.

How does the proposed UNI token burn work?

It involves burning 100 million UNI from the treasury—16% of circulating supply—plus routing Unichain fees to burn more tokens, aiming to reduce supply and increase demand.

What benefits could liquidity providers see from this proposal?

The Protocol Fee Discount Auctions system would offer better returns by auctioning fee discounts, encouraging more participation in Uniswap’s pools.

Is Uniswap still the leading DEX after this update?

Yes, with $4 trillion in cumulative volume since 2018, and this proposal positions it to remain the default choice for decentralized trading of tokenized value.

How does this proposal support DeFi growth?

It includes a Growth Budget of 20 million UNI tokens for grants to developers and builders, prioritizing protocol enhancements and ecosystem expansion.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more