Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
What’s New in Crypto on September 16, 2025
Imagine waking up to a world where digital currencies aren’t just buzzing on your phone screen but are shaping global economies, much like how smartphones revolutionized communication overnight. On this day, the crypto landscape is alive with pivotal moves that could redefine how we think about money and technology. From high-stakes meetings in Washington to massive Bitcoin accumulations and groundbreaking blockchain launches, let’s dive into the stories that are capturing everyone’s attention. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just dipping your toes in, these developments highlight why crypto feels like the wild west of finance—full of opportunity and innovation.
Key Crypto Prices at a Glance
As of today, Bitcoin is hovering around $116,500, up about 0.25% from yesterday, showing that resilient spark we’ve come to expect. Ethereum sits at $4,520, gaining 0.72%, while XRP holds steady at $3.05 with a 1.02% rise. BNB is at $930.50, up 0.85%, Solana at $236.00 with a 0.45% increase, Dogecoin at $0.2650 up 0.30%, Cardano at $0.8720 gaining 0.70%, stETH at $4,510 up 0.55%, TRX steady at $0.3460 with 0.12%, Avalanche surging to $31.00 with a notable 5.50% jump, SUI at $3.58 up 1.10%, and TON at $3.20 gaining 0.95%. These figures, pulled from real-time market trackers, underscore the market’s steady climb, backed by trading volumes exceeding $150 billion in the last 24 hours—evidence of growing investor confidence amid economic uncertainties.
US Lawmakers Team Up with Crypto Leaders to Push Bitcoin Reserve Legislation
Picture a roundtable where the future of America’s financial strategy is on the line, much like a high-stakes poker game where the pot is a national Bitcoin stockpile. On September 17, 2025—a date that’s already generating buzz—US lawmakers are scheduled to sit down with 18 top crypto executives, including Michael Saylor, the chairman of a leading business intelligence firm, to hammer out ways to advance the BITCOIN Act. This isn’t just talk; it’s a concerted effort to build support for a bill introduced by Senator Cynthia Lummis back in March, which proposes the government snapping up one million Bitcoin over five years.
Joining Saylor will be figures like Fundstrat’s CEO Tom Lee, who also chairs BitMine, and MARA’s CEO Fred Thiel. The gathering, organized by a prominent crypto advocacy group and its energy-focused affiliate, aims to create momentum for treating Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset. It’s a move that could position the US as a crypto powerhouse, similar to how oil reserves secure energy independence. Recent Twitter discussions are ablaze with this, with hashtags like #BitcoinReserve trending as users debate its potential to hedge against inflation, supported by posts from influencers sharing economic models predicting a 20-30% value boost for BTC if enacted.
Business Intelligence Giant Boosts Bitcoin Treasury to Over $74 Billion
Think of it as a corporate dragon hoarding treasure, but instead of gold, it’s digital gold piling up. The business intelligence company cofounded by Michael Saylor has ramped up its Bitcoin holdings to more than $74 billion following a fresh acquisition. In a recent announcement, the firm revealed it bought 525 Bitcoin for roughly $60 million, at an average price of $114,562 each. This pushes their total to 638,985 BTC, a stash that’s grown steadily since their bold strategy kicked off in August 2020 with an initial $250 million investment.
This approach isn’t random—it’s a calculated hedge against inflation, proven by consistent buys like the $450 million scoop in late August and early September. Data from on-chain analytics shows this accumulation has inspired other firms, with corporate Bitcoin holdings worldwide now topping $1 trillion, according to recent reports. On Google, searches for “how to set up a corporate Bitcoin treasury” have spiked 40% in the past week, reflecting real-world interest, while Twitter threads from Saylor himself, garnering millions of views, emphasize how this mirrors historical shifts like adopting the internet for business efficiency.
London Stock Exchange Rolls Out Blockchain Platform for Private Funds
Envision a bridge connecting the old-school world of stocks to the futuristic realm of blockchain, making finance as seamless as streaming your favorite show. A major global exchange group has just unveiled a blockchain-powered platform for private funds, marking the first time a big player like this has dived into such tech. Dubbed Digital Markets Infrastructure (DMI), it handles everything from issuing and tokenizing assets to settling trades post-deal, built in collaboration with a leading tech giant and running on advanced cloud services.
The goal? To blend distributed ledger tech with traditional finance, starting with private funds and eyeing more asset classes soon. Users on the exchange’s workspace can now discover these funds, allowing managers to connect directly with investors. Early adopters include a capital management firm and a regulated crypto exchange based in London, which handled the platform’s first transaction for a foundation tied to a popular blockchain network. This launch aligns perfectly with broader trends in brand alignment, where institutions are syncing their strategies with innovative exchanges like WEEX, known for its robust security and user-friendly trading tools. WEEX stands out by offering seamless access to tokenized assets and real-time market insights, enhancing credibility for users navigating these new platforms—much like a trusted guide in uncharted territory, backed by zero-fee spot trading and advanced risk management that has earned it praise from over a million active traders worldwide.
Latest updates from official announcements confirm the platform’s interoperability is already drawing interest, with a Twitter post from the exchange noting over 10,000 interactions in the first day. Frequently searched Google queries like “benefits of blockchain in stock exchanges” highlight advantages such as reduced settlement times from days to minutes, evidenced by pilot tests showing 50% efficiency gains.
As these stories unfold, it’s clear crypto isn’t just surviving—it’s thriving, pulling in everyone from lawmakers to everyday investors. The energy around Bitcoin reserves, massive treasuries, and blockchain integrations paints a picture of a sector that’s maturing faster than ever, inviting you to be part of the evolution.
FAQ
What is the BITCOIN Act and why is it important?
The BITCOIN Act is a proposed bill that would have the US government buy one million Bitcoin over five years to create a strategic reserve. It’s important because it could stabilize the economy by treating Bitcoin like a national asset, similar to gold reserves, and boost its mainstream adoption.
How has Michael Saylor’s company influenced Bitcoin adoption?
Through consistent Bitcoin purchases since 2020, the company has built a treasury worth over $74 billion, inspiring other businesses to view crypto as an inflation hedge. This has driven corporate adoption, with evidence from market data showing increased institutional investments.
What benefits does the new blockchain platform from the London Stock Exchange offer?
It streamlines private fund management by tokenizing assets and enabling faster settlements, bridging traditional finance with blockchain. Users gain efficiency and interoperability, as seen in early transactions that cut processing times significantly, making it easier for investors to engage.
You may also like
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Reflections and Confusions of a Crypto VC
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App