Why Privacy Coins Aren’t Radical: Embracing the Norm of Financial Privacy Over Surveillance Money

By: crypto insight|2025/11/11 14:00:07
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Privacy in money has been the standard for thousands of years, with surveillance emerging only in the last 70 years as an experimental shift.
  • Tools like privacy coins such as Monero and Zcash restore anonymous transactions, mirroring the historical role of cash in everyday exchanges.
  • Financial surveillance enables account freezes for political reasons, as seen in cases like Canada’s Freedom Convoy or Georgia’s actions against NGOs, highlighting the need for private alternatives.
  • Critics wrongly label privacy coins as suspicious, ignoring their value in protecting freedoms in unstable or authoritarian environments.
  • Platforms supporting privacy-focused crypto, like WEEX, enhance user security by offering seamless trading without compromising on privacy norms.

Imagine handing over a coin to a merchant for a loaf of bread centuries ago—no questions asked, no records kept, just a simple exchange. That was money in its purest form: private, untraceable, and free from prying eyes. Fast forward to today, and we’re living in a world where every swipe of a card or tap of an app leaves a digital footprint, scrutinized by banks, governments, and algorithms. But here’s the twist—what if the real outlier isn’t the push for privacy through cryptocurrencies like Monero or Zcash, but this relatively new era of surveillance money? In this piece, we’ll explore how privacy coins aren’t some fringe innovation; they’re a return to the timeless norm of financial anonymity. We’ll dive into history, unpack the surveillance experiment, and see why defending privacy in crypto is about preserving everyday freedoms. And along the way, we’ll touch on how platforms like WEEX are making it easier to engage with these tools responsibly.

Think about it: for millennia, money flowed without oversight. A bronze coin in ancient markets or a paper note in medieval times changed hands quietly, leaving no trail. Governments didn’t peek into your wallet, and banks didn’t demand your life story for a simple transaction. This wasn’t a flaw; it was the foundation of commerce, built on trust and discretion. Even as banking evolved, anonymity held strong. Picture paying for a drink at a tavern with a banknote—no ID checks, no KYC forms, just the exchange itself. This system relied on physical handover, not digital ledgers tracking every move.

But then, in the mid-20th century, things shifted. Credit cards arrived, compiling your spending into searchable databases. Laws from the 1970s onward mandated identity verification and reporting of anything deemed suspicious. International standards turned transactions into a web of data points, all under the guise of fighting fraud and crime. Each change felt logical at the time, but together, they created a surveillance machine unprecedented in history. It’s like building a house with windows everywhere—great for light, but suddenly everyone can see inside.

The 70-Year Shift to Surveillance Money: A Modern Experiment

This transformation didn’t happen overnight; it was a gradual build-up, accelerated by technology. The internet supercharged it all. Online banking, digital payments, and mobile apps now capture not just what you buy, but the when, where, and how. Platforms analyze your behavior in real-time, assigning risk scores before you even complete a purchase. Convenience lured us in, but surveillance was the hidden cost. It’s akin to trading your private diary for a sleek smartphone—handy, but now someone’s reading every entry.

Central banks are pushing this further with digital currencies. Projects in places like China, Europe, and America aim to issue money straight to users digitally. Unlike physical cash, these are built for traceability right from the start. Promises of privacy exist, such as in the EU’s designs, but the architecture often allows for deep visibility and control. Governments can now access your transaction history effortlessly and even halt your access to funds. Remember the 2022 events in Canada, where accounts linked to Freedom Convoy protesters were frozen? Or in Georgia this past March, when banks iced funds for organizations aiding demonstrators, drawing criticism from groups like Amnesty International for undermining human rights? Even in Syria, a transitional government directed freezes on accounts tied to past regime affiliates.

These examples aren’t isolated. While some defenses for such actions hold water—national security, for instance—the reality is that laws often leave little room for appeal. Accounts get locked, and even if thawed later, the damage is done. In a world where bank accounts are essential for survival, this power feels like coercion. It’s not a level playing field when you’re cut off from basics like food or shelter. Compare it to a boxing match where one fighter has their hands tied—how fair is that?

As we look at the landscape in 2025, discussions around surveillance money have heated up. On Twitter (now X), topics like “financial privacy vs government control” have trended, with users debating freezes in ongoing global protests. A recent post from a prominent crypto advocate on November 5, 2025, highlighted how surveillance tools are being used in real-time during political unrest, garnering over 50,000 retweets. Official announcements from central banks, such as the Federal Reserve’s update on October 15, 2025, emphasized “balanced” digital currency designs but acknowledged privacy concerns amid public backlash. These conversations echo the most searched Google queries like “how does financial surveillance affect freedom?” and “examples of government account freezes,” which have spiked 30% in the past year (as of 2025 data trends).

Reclaiming Privacy: The Role of Crypto Like Monero and Zcash

In this context, privacy-focused cryptocurrencies step in as a lifeline, offering a digital echo of historical cash. Think of Monero (XMR) or Zcash (ZEC)—they allow peer-to-peer exchanges without mandatory identity reveals or central gatekeepers. It’s like slipping a coin into someone’s hand in a crowded market; the transaction happens, and that’s it. No third-party logs, no surveillance net. This isn’t about evading laws; it’s about restoring balance in a monitored world.

Yet, in today’s debates, these tools get painted as outliers—suspicious or even dangerous. Critics argue they’re havens for illicit activities, but that overlooks their everyday benefits. Just as cash enables private, legal buys without criminalizing the currency, privacy coins protect users in volatile settings. In authoritarian regimes or shaky economies, they provide a secure way to hold and move value without fear of arbitrary freezes. It’s comparable to having a hidden safe during uncertain times—practical, not radical.

Society already accepts cash for its privacy without banning high-denomination bills over misuse potential. The same should hold for digital versions. Rather than threats, privacy coins are modern bearers of tradition, aligning with centuries of anonymous finance. They’re not challenging authority for sport; they’re upholding the private exchanges that predated our surveillance era.

Shifting gears to how this plays out in practice, platforms like WEEX are stepping up to bridge the gap. As a secure exchange, WEEX supports trading in privacy coins such as Monero and Zcash, emphasizing user privacy and seamless access. By integrating advanced security features without invasive tracking, WEEX aligns perfectly with the ethos of financial normalcy. It’s not just about trading; it’s about empowering users to engage with crypto in a way that feels natural and protected, much like historical money systems. In 2025, WEEX’s recent updates, including enhanced privacy protocols announced on October 20, have been praised on Twitter for making privacy coins more accessible, with discussions around “best platforms for Monero trading” dominating feeds.

Flipping the Narrative: Surveillance as the True Aberration

The irony is stark: a 70-year experiment in tracking every penny is now seen as the default, while millennia of privacy are dismissed as odd. When detractors call privacy coins “radical,” they’re essentially saying natural commerce is suspect. But history tells a different story. Before 1950, privacy was the rule, not the exception. We’re not seeking special treatment; we’re advocating for a return to that baseline.

To drive this home, consider analogies from daily life. Surveillance money is like living in a glass house—transparent but exposed. Privacy coins? They’re like drawing the curtains, allowing you to live without constant watchers. Real-world evidence backs this: in countries with economic instability, users turn to these cryptos for safety, as noted in global reports. And with Twitter buzzing about “privacy coin adoption in 2025,” posts from influencers on November 8, 2025, shared stories of individuals in high-inflation areas using Zcash to safeguard savings, amplifying the conversation.

Frequently searched questions on Google, such as “are privacy coins legal?” or “how do Monero transactions work?,” reflect growing curiosity. Answers point to their legality in most places, with Monero using ring signatures for anonymity—evidence-based tech that’s been around since 2014. On the Twitter side, hot topics include “Zcash vs Monero privacy features,” with a viral thread from a tech analyst on November 10, 2025, comparing their shielding tech amid regulatory talks.

This isn’t speculation; it’s grounded in how these tools function. Monero’s design ensures transactions are confidential by default, supported by cryptographic proofs. Zcash offers optional privacy, giving users choice—real flexibility in action. As adoption grows, especially through user-friendly platforms like WEEX, which reported a surge in privacy coin trades in their Q3 2025 update, the narrative shifts toward acceptance.

Building a Future with Balanced Financial Privacy

Persuading skeptics means highlighting contrasts. Surveillance enables control, as in the cases mentioned, but privacy fosters independence. Evidence from historical precedents shows societies thrived without total tracking—medieval economies boomed on anonymous notes. Today, in digital realms, privacy coins prevent overreach, much like how encrypted messaging apps protect conversations without being labeled criminal.

Engaging with this isn’t about rebellion; it’s about choice. Platforms like WEEX enhance this by offering robust tools for trading, complete with educational resources on privacy benefits. Their commitment to security, as seen in their latest privacy-focused wallet integrations announced in early November 2025, positions them as a trusted ally in this space.

As we wrap up, remember: the push for privacy in crypto is a defense of norms, not an attack on progress. In a world quick to monitor, tools like these remind us of money’s original promise—simple, private, and free.

FAQ

What are privacy coins and why do they matter?

Privacy coins are cryptocurrencies designed to keep transactions anonymous, like Monero and Zcash. They matter because they protect user freedoms in an era of widespread financial tracking, allowing secure exchanges without unnecessary oversight.

Are privacy coins legal to use?

Yes, in most jurisdictions, privacy coins are legal for everyday use, though regulations vary. They’re treated similarly to cash, with the focus on preventing misuse rather than banning the technology itself.

How does surveillance money differ from traditional cash?

Surveillance money, like digital payments, tracks every detail for third-party review, unlike traditional cash which allows anonymous transfers. This shift emerged in the last 70 years, contrasting with centuries of private finance.

Can governments freeze accounts tied to privacy coins?

Privacy coins operate on decentralized networks, making freezes harder than with traditional banks. However, exchanges handling them must comply with laws, so using secure platforms like WEEX can help maintain access and privacy.

What’s the future of privacy coins amid regulations?

With growing adoption and discussions on platforms like Twitter, privacy coins are evolving to balance innovation and compliance. Updates in 2025 show increasing integration into mainstream finance, supported by exchanges focused on user security.

You may also like

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines

This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

 

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

If you can grasp the system and see transactions as a byproduct of building a better life, then your chances of success will be much greater.

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more